Improving Multilingual Math Reasoning via Distillation
Listen to the summary
Uses a voice available on your device
Audio options
On this page
Key Takeaways
- The new method, OPD2, improves performance in English, Korean, and Japanese compared to standard On-Policy Distillation.
- For the Qwen3-1.7B model, OPD2 raised non-thinking average math scores from 55.1 to 63.6 in English, 40.9 to 51.9 in Korean, and 37.2 to 52.0 in Japanese.
- English-only training can transfer reasoning performance to other languages, but it introduces a risk of models generating responses in English rather than the target language.
- OPD2 consistently beats standard OPD across multiple model sizes, showing gains of up to 4.0 points in non-English benchmarks.
Summary & Methodology Analysis
The researchers investigate On-Policy Distillation (OPD), a technique where a student model mimics a teacher model by aligning its generation probabilities to match the teacher's trajectory, to enhance multilingual math reasoning. The core contribution, On-Policy Delta Distillation (OPD2), refines this process by introducing a delta signal. This signal is computed as the difference between the teacher's logit probabilities (the raw output values before normalization) and the base model's logit probabilities. To prevent convergence issues common with this delta signal, the authors incorporate reward centering to create an advantage and use the original OPD signal as a conditioning criterion. This refinement ensures that the model effectively learns from the teacher's refined reasoning patterns during the distillation process.
The experimental evaluation focuses on models including Qwen3-1.7B, Qwen3-8B, and larger variants like Qwen3-30B-A3B-2507 across datasets such as PolyMath, Global-MGSM, HRM8K, and KSM. Results demonstrate clear improvements in multilingual benchmarks. For instance, in the Qwen3-1.7B model, OPD2 yields consistent gains, including a 4.0 point improvement in Japanese math reasoning tasks. Larger models like Qwen3-8B also see performance boosts, with 3.3 and 3.1 point gains respectively in Korean and Japanese tasks compared to the standard OPD baseline. These improvements suggest that distilling reasoning patterns is effective for scaling logic-heavy tasks across languages.
Despite these performance gains, the paper highlights significant limitations in deployment. A major issue is language drift: while reasoning logic transfers from English-only training, the model often fails to respond in the target language, opting for English instead. Furthermore, for models using thinking-mode features, intermediate reasoning traces remain locked in English. The consistency of these gains also varies, as the reduction in performance gaps between English and Korean is not uniform across all benchmarks. The paper does not provide specific data on training latency or compute-cost metrics, though it focuses primarily on the architecture of the distillation signal.
Interactive System Flowchart
Cross-Examination & FAQs
A deeper dive clarifying mechanics, constraints, and baseline evaluations.
Q1. What is the main goal of this research?
The goal is to improve mathematical reasoning in multilingual settings and address the performance gap between English and other languages during model training.
Q2. What is On-Policy Distillation?
It is a training method where a student model is supervised by a teacher model to align its generation probabilities with the teacher's sampled trajectory.
Q3. Did the proposed method improve performance?
Yes, OPD2 consistently outperformed standard OPD and improved non-thinking average scores across English, Korean, and Japanese.
Q4. How does the delta signal work in OPD2?
It calculates the difference between the teacher model's logit probabilities and its base model's logit probabilities to isolate the improvement signal.
Q5. What is reward centering?
It is a component enhancement used in OPD2 to obtain an advantage and help resolve convergence-point issues associated with the delta signal.
Q6. Does training in English help with other languages?
Yes, it can transfer reasoning capabilities, but it often causes the model to output English responses instead of the requested target language.
Q7. What models were tested in this paper?
The researchers tested various Qwen3 models including 1.7B, 8B, and 30B-A3B-2507, alongside Nemotron-SFT-Multilingual-v2 and Nemotron-Math-v2.
Q8. Are there any constraints on language usage in the reasoning traces?
Yes, for models using thinking-mode, the intermediate reasoning traces are primarily generated in English.
Q9. Does this method solve the performance gap across all benchmarks?
No, the paper notes that the reduction in the English-Korean performance gap is not consistent across all benchmarks.